I saved old text biographies Khazin Wikipedia, which was first removed from the site, and then replaced by a negative one. The very fuss with the page Khazin Wikipedia is recognized as the desire of Russian liberals in power to silence the name of Khazin for Internet visitors. Clearly, deleting a page M Khazin from the site showed the political bias of the editors of this online encyclopedia.
Biography text Mikhail Khazin Wikipedia you will find in the middle of the page, and for those interested - I reprinted at the end Khazin's article
Mikhail Khazin was the president of Neocon, an expert consulting company (now dispersed), which will be remembered because of the name neocon word happened. many Khazin M L known for interesting speeches, as he is a colorful television and radio publicist. He leads the internet Mikhail Khazin's blog khazin, and Khazin's website worldcrisis.ru is the most informative on the topic world crisis.
Mikhail Khazin
Predictions M Khazina have a scientific basis on the basis, therefore economist Mikhail Khazin today is a sought-after publicist and commentator. I want to draw attention to how helpless the representatives of the official liberal economic mainstream look, who cannot even imagine the scale of the present crisis, since their "religion" forbids them even to think about the possibility of the end of capitalism. Economics adherents consider today's economic crisis to be ordinary, offering old and, in their opinion, proven solutions that simply do not work. Actually, this is proved by the actions of the leaders of the US Federal Reserve System, who have not been guided by the mantras of economics for a long time. That is why the Russian economic power looks inadequate with its stupid adherence to the textbooks of neoclassical economic theory, which has already been abandoned in the developed countries of capitalism, having switched to manual management of the economy in a crisis.
I draw the attention of readers, what all materials by Mikhail Khazin my site can't accommodate, so Khazin last search on the page Mikhail Khazin
This article is written as an explanation to the heading and placed by me in the dictionary and has a permanent link: http://site/page/hazin
Khazin biography
I think in order to imagine who Khazin Mikhail Leonidovich biography further will be posted as a quote from the site. The biography of such a person as Khazin Wikipedia described as follows:
Mikhail Khazin Wikipedia
September 18, 2006 Khazin M L on his resource WorldCrisis.ru published an article entitled “Kudrin is preparing a new default”, where he suggested the possibility of an imminent default of Russia: “In general, the picture is so reminiscent of the end of 1997 that it becomes scary.”
In October 2008 Khazin predicted such a development of the crisis that had begun: “the US economy will decrease by at least a third. The world will fall by 20 percent. After that, the planet will face 10-12 years of severe depression. In the US and Europe, I think many will be starving. And the car will become a luxury item.”
November 17, 2011 in Astana at a meeting of the discussion club "Expert" at the National Welfare Fund "Samruk-Kazyna" Mikhail Khazin predicted the division of the economic world into “pieces”: “I can say that this will all end in 5–8–10 years with the division of the world into separate pieces. As a result, the rules we are used to will change.”
Khazin books
Kobyakov A. B., Khazin M. L. The decline of the dollar empire and the end of "Pax Americana" - Moscow: Veche, 2003. - 368 p. - (New angle). - 5000 copies. - ISBN 5-9533-0143-X
Khazin M. L. “The Dead End of “Catching Up” Development” and “The Return of the “Red” Project” in the book “Fortress Russia: Farewell to Liberalism”: Sat. articles. - M.: Yauza, Eksmo, 2005. ISBN 5-699-12354-7
Khazin M.L. Preface to the publication in Russian of the book “This time everything will be different. Eight Centuries of Financial Folly" - Carmen M. Reinhart, Kenneth S. Rogoff [trans. from English. D.Storozhenko].-M.: Career Press, 2011.- 528s. ISBN 978-5-904946-02-9
Khazin Mikhail biography which is interesting for its twists and turns, stood along with at the very beginning of the creation of a new economic theory. I consider Mikhail Khazin's main scientific achievement to be fruitful specifically for Russia. In addition to the Wikipedia site, I found another biography of Mikhail Khazin.
How the article about me was destroyed on Wikipedia
Editor's note: "Erasing personalities" from encyclopedias and reference books is traditionally considered a sign of the totalitarian structure of communities. Due to the fact that such a dystopia is practiced by the so-called. "free encyclopedia", we consider the explanations of the famous economist and our author about the motives of its leaders to be illustrative.
The article about me was removed from Wikipedia.
This process went on for two days, and during this time quite a lot of people tried to explain to the functionaries of this resource that this was not entirely correct. Of course, this did not work out, and therefore I consider it appropriate to explain why Wikipedia suddenly decided to do this right now (after many years of the existence of the corresponding article), and why the functionaries of this site could not have behaved differently.
First of all, you need to understand one very important factor: our main achievement in economic science is the creation of a theory that explains the mechanisms and consequences of the current economic crisis.
All the popularity of our site and the views on economics and politics expressed on it is due to the fact that this theory, which arose in the late 90s and early 2000s, allows us to draw conclusions that more adequately reflect reality than mainstream liberal economicsism, which scores today as professional publications and other media.
Both Wikipedia itself and its functionaries are (including) just a mainstream project aimed at introducing a “correct” understanding of life into the uneducated (through the efforts of the modern elite) masses. In terms of economics, of course, economics. And here begins the most serious disagreement, which cannot end with any agreement. It is connected with the fact that within the framework of economics there is not and cannot be an adequate theory of the crisis - I wrote about this many times. And if the theory of crisis is not in economics, then, from the point of view of adherents, it should not be in any other place, since it is economics that is the “only true” economic theory.
For this reason, adherents of economicsism can never admit that such a theory can exist somewhere - it is simply impossible, since it is self-discrediting. This is taboo. As a consequence, they fundamentally deny that we have such a theory. And if there is no theory, then we are automatically cheaters, charlatans and hoaxers who lie to the masses for the sake of gaining popularity for some personal purposes. Well, within the framework of their understanding, most likely, material. To believe that we are simply explaining how things are, I repeat once again, they cannot, because within the framework of their understanding of the theory of crisis there cannot be.
In this sense, it is very funny that they included in an article about me (now deleted) a forecast from an interview in Komsomolskaya Pravda, which I gave in the summer of 2008, even before the start of the September deflationary shock. It spoke about the fall in the average standard of living of the population after the crisis, which not only has not yet ended, but is at its very beginning. And the administrators of Wikipedia, apparently, considered this text as a sign of severe inadequacy. And by the way, this text was always remembered as my unfulfilled forecast - although, I repeat once again, the time has clearly not yet come to that, structural imbalances in the world economy have not yet been compensated.
For a while, adherents of economicsism (including Wikipedia functionaries) simply ignored our existence. Then they fought back in different forums, however, as the crisis developed, and the popularity of our economic theory (“neoconomics”) grew, they began to experience severe cognitive dissonance. More precisely, even two. First, their own "gurus" clearly could not explain the causes and extent of the crisis, and therefore their attacks on our theory drastically reduced their authority among the public.
Secondly, like all adherents of a theory that is not quite adequate for today, but terribly aggressive theory, they highly value their “mission”. This is clearly seen from the discussions in the process of deleting an article about me, in which the mentioned functionaries were actively rude to the new participants in the discussion, clearly demonstrating their personal importance to them. In addition, this is very clearly visible on their own pages, on which they hang each other with various regalia, from the number of which the “personally dear Leonid Ilyich” would most likely drool. And since the popularity of our theory is growing all the time (I repeat once again - for the reason that it gives clear and verifiable explanations of the events that have happened and has already a fairly long history of verifiable forecasts), it becomes more and more difficult to refute it, and most importantly, participation in such refutations is clearly lowers the status of the members.
Judging by certain circumstances, the significance of our theory in the eyes of society, and not only Russian, has recently grown significantly. And this seriously excited the participants in the economicsist movement. They cannot openly oppose our theory, since they are not able to give arguments against it. They can no longer say that the theory does not exist, because too many people can object to them, and this undermines the monopoly claims of economicsism. Therefore, one must pretend that the theory does not exist.
Mikhail Khazin is a Russian economist and analyst who is known for his sharp statements about economic and political events and news.
Mikhail Leonidovich is popular in the blogosphere, he is often invited as an expert in television and radio programs. Khazin's forecasts often cause heated controversy both on the part of the professional community and among the townsfolk.
Childhood and youth
Mikhail Leonidovich was born on May 5, 1962 in Moscow. His father, Leonid Grigoryevich Khazin, was a researcher at the Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and was engaged in the theory of stability. Mom also devoted herself to science - she worked as a teacher of higher mathematics at the Institute of Electronic Engineering.
Khazin's grandfather, Grigory Leizerovich, was a prominent creator of the defense shield of the motherland - he participated in the creation of the Moscow air defense system. For this he was awarded the Stalin Prize in 1949.
Since childhood, Misha dreamed of following in the footsteps of his parents. The boy studied at a mathematical school, was going to enter the Mekhmat of Moscow State University. By coincidence, he was forced to first submit documents to Yaroslavl University, but already from the middle of his second year he transferred to Moscow State University. Mikhail was assigned to the Department of Probability Theory, where he learned mathematical statistics. Mikhail defended his diploma with a degree in statistics.
His younger brother Andrei Khazin is an academician of the Russian Academy of Arts, historian and art critic, professor at Moscow State University.
Many are interested in the nationality of Mikhail Khazin. Judging by the grandfather's name and patronymic, Grigory Leizerovich Khazin was a Jew, but according to the repeated assertion of Mikhail Leonidovich himself, they are Don Cossacks on the maternal side.
Career
Khazin first worked at the Institute of Statistics of the USSR State Statistics Committee with Emil Ershov. Then he became the head of the analytics department in a private bank. After that, Mikhail Leonidovich enters the civil service and begins a difficult career path through the Ministry of Economics to work in a specialized department under the President of the Russian Federation.
Mikhail's career prospects were greatly spoiled by his personal qualities (uncompromisingness, harshness, arrogance) and his bright, but "uncomfortable" public speeches, reports and articles for colleagues and superiors. He is fired from the service, so Khazin moves to work in the private sector, creates a business based on advising on building relationships with government agencies, as well as on auditing.
Gradually, he returns to work with large influential services and social institutions in the state, and in 2016, as a member of the Rodina political party, he takes part in the elections to the State Duma.
Mikhail Leonidovich is a prominent economist, therefore, in his work, he pays special attention to the economic component of the largest events in recent world history. Being an experienced analyst who is able to consider historical events from a different angle, he creates a number of theories about the global crisis and the reasons for its formation. It is not surprising that some of them are reflected in his publications. Several books about the crisis came out from Khazin's pen.
Together with like-minded Sergey Shcheglov, Mikhail Leonidovich publishes the book "Stairway to Heaven", which forces the reader to rethink the concept of Power and the unspoken rules of action if a person has it. The authors analyze events in politics and economics, otherwise they tell the stories of the formation and collapse of the owners of corporations with a worldwide reputation and the reputation of "unsinkable".
In 2017, he presented his new literary work - The Black Swan of the World Crisis. The book includes his articles from 2003 to 2017: results, forecasts, comments on the topic of the day. In fact, this is a chronicle of the development of the crisis that the world economy has been experiencing for about ten years now.
Mikhail publishes all his thoughts and comments in a blog on his own website, and also regularly voices them through the media. The economist at various times was the host and author of a number of socio-political programs on radio and television. His photos and author's columns were published in scientific and specialized economic journals. Now Khazin is a permanent guest expert on Ekho Moskvy radio and a columnist on their website.
Mikhail Khazin is a prominent figure in the media space. Each of his performances becomes an occasion for public discussions, the assessment of Khazin's words sometimes turns out to be polar - some call him "second", others take Mikhail's words for groundless "nonsense of a madman". One thing is clear for sure - the analyst is able to convincingly sort out his version of the development of events so that it is accessible and understandable to the general population. He uses a living language, speaks with warmth and passion.
In the early 2000s, Mikhail became the founder of a new economic theory that predicts a global crisis and a complete transformation of the world market. The analyst assigns the main role in this process to America. Therefore, Mikhail Leonidovich repeatedly predicted certain changes that subsequently actually took place in the United States of America.
Khazin was one of the first to talk about as a real candidate for the presidency of the country. Mikhail Leonidovich carefully analyzed the trends among lobbyists and the mood of citizens, also added to this the events predicted by the United States according to his author's economic concept, and said that Trump would be the winner.
Mikhail Khazin on Donald Trump's reformsThe analyst also announced Trump's victory in advance - according to his calculations, the US elections were democratic, and this is what allowed Donald Trump to win. He was voted for by the middle class and businessmen who wanted to keep their finances and corporations for the next four years.
He also predicted that the US president would dramatically change course in the political arena and be the first to advocate the redistribution of the spheres of influence of the United States, Russia, China and India in the world. Thus, these four countries will be responsible for maintaining peace in each of their spheres of influence. In the meantime, the US will be busy saving its own economy, even if it means a crash for the global market.
Mikhail Khazin in the studio "Echo of Moscow" However, not all of Mikhail Leonidovich's predictions come true. For example, in 2009, he predicted a famine in Europe in three years, predicted oil at $25 per barrel and the dollar at 45 rubles, and millions of unemployed clerks on the streets of Moscow.
Personal life
Mikhail Khazin tries not to advertise his personal life. It is known that he has a wife, Alexandra, whom he married in 1993. In an interview, Mikhail Leonidovich let slip that he has a daughter. The girl lives in Japan, in Kyoto. And judging by Mikhail's social networks, her name is Anastasia. Whether the economist has other children is not known for certain.
Mikhail does not support relations with his younger brother Andrei. They haven't spoken in many years.
Khazin is a socially active person. Perhaps it is in all modern social networks. He maintains a blog on LiveJournal, has pages on Facebook,
I thought for a long time about what the problems of Ukraine are - why it is in no way able to become a normal state.
And finally, I think I understand. P (p) why rather by chance - my eyes stopped on the book of Karel Capek and I remembered one of his stories.
Since the story is rather short, I quote it in full.
Karel Capek
Crime in a peasant family
Translation by T. Axel and O. Molochkovsky
Defendant, stand up, - said the chairman of the court. You are accused of murdering your father-in-law Frantisek Lebeda.
During the investigation, you admitted that with the intention to kill Lebeda, you hit him three times on the head with an axe.
Do you plead guilty?
The emaciated peasant shuddered and swallowed his saliva.
- No, he said.
- But did you kill Swan?
- So you plead guilty?
- July 25th, 2016 03:38 am
Here, some colleagues blame me for being wrong with Khazin. Although in the publication he presented only facts and almost nothing but them.
A similar case was with another character, two years ago very popular. And when that, the hero of two years ago, had to be criticized, and also based solely on well-known facts, then with might and main went unfriends.
What turned out to be true? In terms of time? Listen to Pyakin. He was also a hero at that time. Then, however, the tack had to be made.
So it will be with Khazin. I don’t attack people without reason and I don’t engage in baseless criticism.
Practice, not fashion for analysts, is the criterion of truth.
- July 24th, 2016 , 09:24 am
Oh, and all sorts of Khazins know how to rub themselves into the most diverse social strata!
Here is the brother of the famous "economist" Mikhail - Andrei Leonidovich. It seems to be an art historian to the marrow of his bones - after all, but Academician of the Russian Academy of Arts, where, of course, solid art.
Well, art, so art. But after all, Andrey (that's a versatile person!) For more than 6 years, he sowed liberal evil and, I hope, not eternal within the walls of the Higher School of Economics. And, mind you, the liberals of the HSE do not yet apply for the distribution of non-economic arts.
"HSE research activities are carried out in such areas as economic theory, history of economic thought, institutional economic theory, macroeconomics, mathematical and instrumental methods in economics, sociology, law, psychology, public administration, education, information science and political research."()
- December 2nd, 2015 06:28 pm
Popular in some circles, a former employee of the Institute of Statistics of the USSR State Statistics Committee, who became an economist (here honor and praise to him: the worldview must be expanded) Mikhail Leonidovich Khazin in an interview on ... "Echo of Moscow" with pride declared following:
“I am a patriot of my country and I understand what is good and what is bad. But I didn’t see the point in joining the Communist Party.”
The interviewer, S. Korzun, naturally asked the former "Member of the Komsomol Committee of the Institute of its Physical Chemistry" , why the Komsomolets did not see the point. And you know, Mikhail Leonidovich demonstrated one more of his remarkable qualities: disarming frank simplicity.
“I was made from an engineer to a junior research assistant, they increased my salary, and I would have to pay dues more heavily, there, instead… I said that I don’t want to pay…”
What loyalty to your ideals! And we wonder how it is at once Komsomol committee members suddenly changed their Komsomol convictions to the exact opposite: liberal. And together they became businessmen. ()
- September 6th, 2013 08:21 pm
To say the least, a strange statement. After all, when they use the word “analogue”, they mean, with differences in form, the preservation of the essence, the main connections of the system.
Enclosure is the deprivation of the vast majority of the English peasantry of the land that they have rented and inherited for generations. Thus, the land was confiscated from the peasants, and in exchange the most severe laws were adopted, directed against the resulting landless vagabonds, involuntarily.
But the collectivization it's completely different. Yes, land was taken away from the landowner, but he received the right to his share, i.e. became a co-owner on a par with fellow villagers. In addition, the former landowners were by no means deprived of their means of subsistence or the opportunity to work on the land.
The difference, as you can see, is huge. and she - fundamental. So when a popular teller of Jewish jokes, relaxing us with another tale about Moses, immediately throws into our subconscious the formula fencing = collectivization, then it should be noted the absolutely anti-Russian nature of such speeches with a sweet Jewish smile.
()
- August 2nd, 2013 04:43 pm
A politician is not necessarily just someone who sits in the Kremlin. There is a big beast, and the very political fabric of Russia is formed from the efforts of millions of ordinary people. Those who are members of parties, public associations, unions. Those who write in newspapers and blogs on political topics.
Therefore, when Mikhail Khazin called S. Kurginyan a talker and a liar, he thereby tried to insult hundreds of thousands of people whose political activities are concentrated around the “Essence of Time” movement, including those organizations that enter into tactical or strategic alliances with it. For example, All-Russian Parental Resistance. According to Khazin, it turns out that they all cooperate or support an unworthy person.
()
- July 3rd, 2013 09:12 am
Article Vladimir Zolin served in abbr.
"A business that produces nothing but money is a poor business"
Henry Ford .
Let us first define that the concept market"is the same ideal essence as" democracy", opposed to the threat of " communism". For reality is harsh and without politics, the economy goes, perhaps, to the collective farm market. Market participants, oh, how unequal, and goods are often imposed on us not at all according to market imperatives.
.
Stock and commodity markets are already visible without glasses, like financial pyramids, where stock exchanges do not regulate and evaluate, but provide financial mechanisms for speculation, linking the production of a printing press and an elementary casino. Let's take a closer look at the casino.
.
Like sweepstakes, they, having paid a share of the turnover to both the owner and patrons, allow only players " exchange» means. It is naive to believe that the active struggle of the new government against these vices is dictated by concern for “ moral image of the builder of capitalism". No, you NEED to play only on the stock exchanges: the same " field of fools”, where Pinocchio buried coins with no less success. Otherwise, how to take the heavily printed Fed money out of circulation and delay inflation and an imminent collapse? How to increase the value of one's own assets against those of others for the purchase of subsoil and land?
- July 2nd, 2013 04:10 pm
M. Khazin was criticized in this journal a year ago for his duplicitous position. On the one hand, Mikhail revealed his cherished desire to create a right-wing party, and on the other hand, he made constant and persistent curtsies towards the Red Idea.
We don’t hear more statements from M. Khazin about building a right-wing party, on the contrary, support for the Red Project is felt in his rhetoric (for example, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czYxY5vqHfM). Well, the phenomenon is encouraging and even has a historical parallel: let us recall the public repentance of A. Wasserman, the change in his own worldview.
Thus, both defectors became popular among the patriots and became among the leaders among the heralds of the future transformation of society. What, if we recall the history of revolutions on the planet, is a very characteristic phenomenon for a wide variety of Jews: as Jews ( those. Jews professing Judaism), and for the Zionists ( supporters of a unified Jewish state). Let us recall the composition of the first governments of post-revolutionary Russia...
(
The idea of the “new Yalta” is based on the fact that the victorious powers of financial globalism, the “Western” global project (which has determined the world order for several decades) have the right to determine the new world order. I note, by the way, that I consider the name "Yalta-2" categorically unacceptable, because ...
03.02.2020
... One can find with interest that there is practically no real information about the virus itself, with the exception of various kinds of conspiracy theories. The mortality rate from it is not very clear (although, apparently, it is already clear that it is much lower than that of ...
31.01.2020
In recent days, statistics have given out a lot of new and interesting information, which almost completely confirmed my explanations on the strategy of the Russian monetary authorities, that is, the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance. But first things first. First of all, there is information...
23.01.2020
The "unexpected" resignation of the government showed a lot of new and interesting things from the point of view of studying our political science community. Actually, for me, one, as it seems to me, the most significant point became the most interesting: the complete absence of a more or less reasonable explanation for what Putin ...
17.01.2020
The government resigned and, in general, everyone understands that it left because of failures in economic policy. At the same time, the degree of distortion of reality on his part turned out to be so high that it is not even very clear what ...
16.01.2020
Yesterday's events categorically demand to speak out, which I do in this text. But since I have already said a lot, I will say a part in a tongue twister. First of all, let me remind you that, as my previous analysis shows, the only guarantee of security for ...
28.12.2019
This text is not a highly scientific economic study, these are just the observations of an average person who is in no way a “Kremlin insider”. For more than 20 years I have not been either in the Kremlin or in the Old ...
11.12.2019
The entire management elite of the West (both purely economic and political) fell into a state of severe cognitive dissonance, very similar to the one in which Soviet functionaries were in 1988-90. They continue to perform their functions (for example, an attack on ...
23.11.2019
When the destruction of education began in our country, naturally, I was very worried. Since any teacher cannot look indifferently at how his native system is being destroyed, it is like looking at a fire in a house in which ...
20.11.2019
Recently, rumors about the notorious "transit of power" have become extremely intensified in our country. I have already explained many times why I consider this term, as well as the process described by it, to be stupidity (well, or, more precisely, fantasies), but there is a natural ...
08.11.2019
We all remember Chubais' famous statement that he did not think at all about legislation, justice, or the interests of society during the privatization process. He was worried about only one thing: each act of privatization, in his words, meant another nail ...
05.11.2019
I also need to say a few words on this sore subject. What does "political repression" actually mean? This means that the decisions of people's destinies were made for purely political reasons and outside the framework of the judicial system. Well, for example, those killed by American police ...
03.11.2019
As the classics taught us, "being determines consciousness." This is not only the basis of materialism (on which Marxism is built), but also, in general, a rather familiar everyday form. In the end, we know for sure, “whoever has dinner with a girl, that is her and ...
31.10.2019
One of the concepts that justifies the current state of affairs in our country is the concept of Catherine's "golden age". Like, even then the people lived in poverty, the nobles and officials stole, and the country developed and expanded! And therefore, not...
17.10.2019
The Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics was awarded... The question is, to whom and why? Let's first hear what interested people have to say. So, let's give the floor to Kostya Sonin. I will not comment on his level and understanding of the economy, the main thing is…
15.10.2019
In the previous text, I wrote about the "occupied" United States of America. This is a very important text, because it shows that today it is pointless to describe the political collisions in this country, from the point of view of the analysis of political institutions (hello political scientists!), because ...
The State Duma in the last days of its work adopted a number of laws that deserve special attention. One of them lowers the threshold of criminal liability of citizens for the use of physical force. That is, for beating people for the first time, an administrative punishment is provided, for repeated beating - a criminal one. There is only one exception - intra-family situations. That is, if you spank your child for bad behavior, keep in mind that it is now a criminal offense. At the same time, if you are subjected to criminal punishment, then, according to the norms of juvenile justice, the child will be taken away from you. Thus, our deputies, despite the statements of the president and other politicians that the family is the basis of society, anti-family laws are being quietly pushed through. This happens for many reasons, but the main one is that the homosexual lobby around the world is seeking to legalize the adoption of children by same-sex couples. Since such couples cannot give birth themselves, they need a market for children. The current Russian legislation makes it possible to take away children from quite prosperous parents, even on administrative matters. It is mainly well-to-do families that fall under the blow, because healthy, smart children with good heredity are valued on the market. At the same time, it is extremely difficult to return children back to their parents. I think we all need to make every effort to stop this lawlessness, and ask ourselves: why do our deputies vote for such laws and who pays them? It is known that we have foreign companies that sell children not only to homosexual families, but also for organs. So maybe it's time to deal with these companies?
The second, in my opinion, important law allows creditors to demand repayment of debts from their borrowers without a court decision. This does not yet apply to mortgages, but affects all other types of lending. While all over the world, financial companies are beginning to call for accountability, in our country they are actually being given a free hand. For example, in the United States, the main task of the bankruptcy law is the preservation of business entities. That is, if there is a problematic plant, after bankruptcy it should continue to work, and everything else, as far as possible. In our country, the director of such a plant, under the threat of criminal punishment, must stop production, fire people and sell all his machines. Given the current situation in our economy, we will have to close half of all factories in the fall. And against this background, the deputies adopted a law that will finally kill business.
It is especially useful to reflect on these and other laws adopted by the outgoing State Duma on the eve of the upcoming parliamentary elections. Do we really need such deputies?
